| Table of Contents | ||
|---|---|---|
|
...
Attendance: Miriam Centeno, Nena Couch, Courtney Hunt, Johanna Meetz, Dan Noonan, Terry Reese, Beth Snapp and Maureen Walsh
Guests: Sue Beck,
Agenda
Action Items Review
...
Regrets: Terry Reese
Guests: Sue Beck,
Agenda
Action Items Review
...
- Recap of JamBoard session
- Additional insights
- UL Communications UL Communications plans
- Additional Insights:
- An overarching concern expressed here and in other conversations is how does the UL define “digital projects”?
- The University Libraries (UL) has a lack of overall priority management:
- Who decides on the priority?
- What drives the priority decisions?
- The UL lacks digital content policy to clarify the selection criteria for long-term preservation and stewardship versus transactional work that can be discarded; preservation and long-term stewardship of digitized content is assumed, as opposed to being assessed. UL should be looking to balance:
- retaining all digitized content to ease access (research must go on while everyone works remote) and
- discarding one-off content that does not support a priority or strategic plan
Update of SIPOC/RACI/Brainwriting sessions:
...
Attendance: Miriam Centeno, Nena Couch, Courtney Hunt, Johanna Meetz, Dan Noonan, Terry Reese, Beth Snapp and Maureen Walsh
Guests: Sue Beck, Sarah Collier, Amy McCrory
Agenda
Action Items Review
...
- Dan: Do we need SIPOC for Access Services re: Google Books?
- Dan/Sue: Recap JamBoard discussion
June 23, 2020
Attendance: Miriam Centeno, Nena Couch, Courtney Hunt, Johanna Meetz, Dan Noonan, Terry Reese, Beth Snapp and Maureen Walsh
Guests: Sue Beck, Karla Streib & Jenifer Vinopal
Agenda
Welcome of guests & new member
...