...
- Develop test/pilot rubric and table-top exercise
- Do we use just a numeric system?
- It could be like "candidate" ranking? Initial score with discussion
- May be composite scoring and not exactly granular – adding "human" factor
- Possibly an ongoing regular "meeting of the minds"
- Think about it in terms of projects, not daily work
- Regardless there must be a certain % of time that i set aside to do regular work
- Think about work in a 1/4ly fashion?
- How do we account for disruptions and re-prioritizing work?
- 60 project / 30 ongoing / 10 admin weekly splits (what do these represent???)
- Regular discussion schedules valuable; how does new work impact priority of stuff already in the pipeline? Especially from disparate groups
- Need to keep core group small and manageable; invite others ad hoc as needed
- Start w/possibly monthly meetings and other communication channels
- Representative sample of projects:
- Each group come up w/a couple projects
- What does a proposal look like?
- What level of "projects" would come to this "group"?
- How does "routine" work factor in?
- What is "routine" work?
- Is the digitization proposal form good enough?
- Do we tweak it?
- Do we have turn our factors into a checklist?
- Let's not make it arduous?
- eg: CWRU https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KTGdAfYKWX6x6Hae_F4DonbEdqtF7o4Hkx56wBrA2K4/edit#gid=1266435649
- Action Items
- Draft Rubric - Dan & Sue
- Sample Projects -- Heads
...