Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Meetings

December 13, 2021

Attendance: Sue Beck, Morag Boyd, Miriam Centeno, Tamar Chute, Nena Couch, Dan Noonan , & Jenny Robb , & Gene Springs

Regrets: Gene Springs

Agenda

  • Rubric discussion- walked through and discussed revised Rubric
  • Action Items:
    • Dan:
      • Split out EDIA as its own category
      • Fix "Priorities and Objectives" language possibly strategic pillars and initiatives
    • All:
      • Examples/language for "future efficiencies" for digitized materials
      • Examples of "exigent circumstances" and how justified, partially justified or not justified
      • Key Accountable role
        • Is this the correct label or is there a better one?
        • Which elements actually need one?
        • Is there only one for a designated element or more?
  • Next Steps:
    • Socialize with the larger DP&A
    • Finalize Rubric
    • Establish how we will roll it out and who who be part of and govern process
    • Establish how we will measure success

October 21, 2021

Attendance: Sue Beck, Morag Boyd, Miriam Centeno, Tamar Chute, Nena Couch, Dan Noonan, Jenny Robb, & Gene Springs

...

  • Rubric discussion
    • Using an example it was hard to answer questions. We need to have a guide as to what questions needs to be answered from the proposer  

    • The copyright risk assessment exemptions show stopper is problematic! 

    • Exigent circumstances – should the 0-3  (justified to not justified) should be reverse? Exist or nonexistent is more appropriate. 

    • Priorities and Objections of University Libraries (need clarification regarding what objectives and priorities are we talking about, is this the strategic objectionsobjectives?) 

    • Impact statement for digitization when it comes to future efficiencies  

    • If a project gets rejected, what do I do with the images that have already been digitized? 
      • The Rubric is not so much about negating a project, its about prioritizing it on a sliding scale with other existing projects.
    • Impact of other projects and work conducted by one unit need to be considered earlier on from a "project" prioritization point-of-view
    • GAP: Is there a workflow for already digitized items that just need to be ingested in a preservation repository?

...