Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

October 21, 2021

Attendance: Sue Beck, Morag Boyd, Miriam Centeno, Tamar Chute, Nena Couch, Dan Noonan, Jenny Robb, & Gene SpringsSprings

Agenda

  • Rubric discussion
    • Using an example it was hard to answer questions. We need to have a guide as to what questions needs to be answered from the proposer  

    • The copyright risk assessment exemptions show stopper is problematic! 

    • Exigent circumstances – should the 0-3  (justified to not justified) should be reverse? Exist or nonexistent is more appropriate. 

    • Priorities and Objections of University Libraries (need clarification regarding what objectives and priorities are we talking about, is this the strategic objections?) 

    • Impact statement for digitization when it comes to future efficiencies  

    • If a project gets rejected, what do I do with the images that have already been digitized? 
      • The Rubric is not so much about negating a project, its about prioritizing it on a sliding scale with other existing projects.
    • Impact of other projects and work conducted by one unit need to be considered earlier on from a "project" prioritization point-of-view
    • GAP: Is there a workflow for already digitized items that just need to be ingested in a preservation repository?

September 23, 2021

Attendance: Sue Beck, Morag Boyd, Miriam Centeno, Tamar Chute, Nena Couch, Dan Noonan & Jenny Robb

...